Print this page Email this page | Users Online: 29
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2023  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 6-10

Assessing the relationship between the intercondylar distance and mandibular intercanine distance in orthopantomogram – A retrospective study


Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Praveena Prabhakar
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, GST Road, Chinnakolambakam, Palayanur, Chengalpattu - 603 308, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_132_22

Rights and Permissions

Background: In completely edentulous patients, it is necessary to replace the teeth with at most esthetics and comfort with less patient strain. Aim: The current retrospective study was done to find the relationship between the intercondylar distance and intercanine distance of the mandible by obtaining the ratio using an orthopantomogram (OPG) for lower anterior teeth selection in completely edentulous patients. Materials and Methods: The OPG of 500 subjects was selected randomly. The OPGs were taken using the Sirona Orthophos XG machine and exposed for 14.1 s at 64 kvp, 8 mA. Then, the intercondylar distance and mandibular intercanine distance were measured from the soft copy of the OPG using the software “Sidexis.” The required measurements were taken digitally from the OPG using the software “Sidexis” in millimeters (mm). The SPSS software version 22.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Pearson correlation coefficients (r) displayed a significant positive association between the intercondylar distance and intercanine distance of the mandible (r = 0.42; P = 0.0002). The correlation between intercondylar width and mandibular intercanine width was significant and positive for men (r = 0.26, P = 0.0003) but negative for women (r = −0.41, P = 0.0001). The ratio between the mean intercondylar width and the mean intercanine width was 1:4.90. Conclusion: The mandibular intercanine distance and the intercondylar distance have a positive and significant association. The ratio obtained in this study was 1:4.90 between the mandibular intercanine distance and the intercondylar distance that could be employed for the choice of mandibular anterior teeth.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
Next article
Previous article
Table of Contents

Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Citation Manager
Access Statistics
Reader Comments
Email Alert*
Add to My List*
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed196    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded29    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal