Print this page Email this page | Users Online: 910
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 74-75

Shifting focus from subtractive to additive technology in digital prosthodontics


Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, SBV University, Puducherry, India

Date of Submission29-Apr-2022
Date of Decision07-May-2022
Date of Acceptance09-May-2022
Date of Web Publication20-Jun-2022

Correspondence Address:
Prof. P S Manoharan
Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, SBV University, Puducherry
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_66_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

The advancements in digital technologies have found a widespread application in fabrication of dental restoration with adequate precision and accuracy. Digital methods which are commonly used for fabrication of prosthesis include subtractive methods such as milling and additive methods such as photomelting and photopolymerizing. Digitalization and accuracy are paving the way toward additive technology. The main purpose of this short communication is to mention the advantages, applications, and studies comparing additive and subtractive technology.

Keywords: Additive technology, milling, selective laser sintering


How to cite this article:
Koppolu SK, Manoharan P S. Shifting focus from subtractive to additive technology in digital prosthodontics. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2022;13:74-5

How to cite this URL:
Koppolu SK, Manoharan P S. Shifting focus from subtractive to additive technology in digital prosthodontics. SRM J Res Dent Sci [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 3];13:74-5. Available from: https://www.srmjrds.in/text.asp?2022/13/2/74/347819

The past 30 years witnessed the evolution of computer-aided designing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), which paved the way for the development of numerous CAD/CAM systems with a wide range of applications from designing and fabrication of complete dentures, implant restorations, and maxillofacial prosthesis to planning and manufacturing of orthodontic appliances. The conventional wax patterns were gradually being replaced with digitally milled or printed resin patterns. The basic functional components involved in CAD/CAM systems are data acquisition, restoration design, and restoration fabrication.[1] The primary ways of digitally fabricating the prosthesis are by subtractive and additive technology.

Subtractive technology functions by milling/grinding of large solid blocks into a desired restoration using sharp cutting tools. Greater accuracy will be achieved using a smaller diameter cutting tool. They are classified into dry/wet milling and based on the number of axes (i.e., 3 axes, 4 axes, or 5 axes). The major advantage of subtractive technology is fabrication of homogeneous objects and fabrication of prosthesis which can withstand high occlusal load. The drawback of milling is wastage of the material, overmilling, and low retention of restoration.

Additive technology works on the principle of layer-on layer addition for the fabrication of objects. After designing the restoration, the CAD image is segmented into multislice images. The material will be laid down in incremental way to obtain a desired shape, which will be refined to obtain the final shape. There are multiple advantages in using additive technology such as no material wastage, incremental vertical buildup, fabrication of large objects, and fine details production. The major problem with additive technology is the shrinkage of model. There are several techniques which use additive technology such as stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), fused deposition modeling, direct metal laser sintering, and direct light projection (DLP).[1] The commonly used materials used in digital manufacturing are mentioned in [Table 1].
Table 1: Materials used in digital manufacturing[1]

Click here to view


Multiple studies were done comparing the additive and subtractive technologies in the recent decade. On comparing the complete dentures fabricated using rapid prototyping (3D printing) and CAD-CAM milling, CAD-CAM milled dentures showcased superior results in the trueness of the intaglio surface.[2] While the accuracy of surgical splints fabricated with milling was superior compared to 3D printing.[3] Some studies mentioned the superiority of additive technology. Additive techniques such as SLA and DLP showed better adaptation of denture metal bases than the milling technique. Whereas among additive, SLA showed smooth and precise margins compared to the DLP technique.[4] The accuracy of inlay restoration was superior with additive technique (SLA and SLS) than milling.[5]

CAM continues to undergo significant and regular improvements. Various approaches are evolving in additive technology in strive of achieving accurate results. Henceforth, further research should be focused on achieving more precise results using additive technology.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:72-84.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, Müller F, Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:637-43.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Palazzo G, Ronsivalle V, Oteri G, Lo Giudice A, Toro C, Campagna P, et al. Comparison between additive and subtractive CAD-CAM technique to produce orthognathic surgical splints: A personalized approach. J Pers Med 2020;10:273.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
You SG, You SM, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:479-85.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bae EJ, Jeong ID, Kim WC, Kim JH. A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:187-93.  Back to cited text no. 5
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed64    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded8    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal