Print this page Email this page | Users Online: 180
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 178-184

In vitro comparison of Biodentine and Riva LC interfaces with cervical dentin and Filtek Z350 in posterior class II open sandwich restorations

1 University of Monastir, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Biological and Clinical Dento-Facial Approach Laboratory (ABCDF) LR12ES10, Tunisia
2 University of Monastir, Faculty of Medicine, Tunisia

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Aguir Mabrouk Najet
Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, Biological and Clinical Dento Facial Approach, LR12ES10, 5019 Monastir
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_61_18

Rights and Permissions

Class II open sandwich restorations are routinely performed with resin-modified glass ionomer cement as a dentin substitute and with composite resin as an enamel substitute. Biodentine™ is a new calcium silicate-based material. Various authors have evaluated the microleakage of composite resin restorations, where different resin-modified glass ionomer cements and Biodentine, used as a dentin base, were compared in class II open sandwich restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate and to compare in vitro the sealing ability of Biodentine™ and Riva LC with cervical dentin and Filtek Z350 in posterior proximal restorations using the dye penetration test.

Print this article     Email this article
Next article
Previous article
Table of Contents

Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Citation Manager
Access Statistics
Reader Comments
Email Alert*
Add to My List*
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded99    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal